tOP Stories Opinion JOB - EDU Agriculture BIOGRAPHY LIFESTYLE SPORTS TECH GOVT SCHEMES

Bhutan-India E20 Petrol Row: Editor Sticks to His Story Despite Government Denial

A war of words has broken out between a senior Bhutanese journalist and India’s Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas over whether Indian Oil Marketing Companies (OMCs) offered to supply E20 (20% ethanol-blended) petrol to Bhutan — and whether Bhutan turned it down.

How It Started

Tenzing Lamsang, editor of The Bhutanese, reported last week that Bhutan had politely declined an offer from Indian OMCs to supply E20 petrol. Citing sources, his paper said Bhutan’s decision came down to ethanol’s hygroscopic nature — its tendency to absorb moisture — which could pose serious problems given the country’s old and potentially leaky underground storage tanks, especially in its Himalayan terrain.

Lamsang first flagged the report on X (formerly Twitter) on July 3, saying Bhutan lacked the storage infrastructure needed for such a moisture-sensitive fuel.

The Government Pushes Back

Two days later, on July 5, India’s Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas issued a fact-check on its official X handle, calling the report “incorrect.” The ministry stated flatly that no OMC had made any such offer, and that no proposal to export E20 to Bhutan existed at all. It urged the public to rely only on official government sources.

https://twitter.com/PetroleumMin/status/2073644779754393858

Editor Stands His Ground

Lamsang didn’t back down. In response, he posted what he described as a written reply from Bhutan’s Department of Trade — a document he said confirmed that Indian OMCs had indeed raised the subject of E20 during technical-level meetings, and that Bhutan’s Department of Trade had responded by asking the companies to continue supplying regular petrol instead. Lamsang added that his own verbal interviews with officials backed up this version of events.

Where the Dispute Actually Lies

Here’s the crux of the disagreement: the document Lamsang shared reportedly does not use the specific words “formal offer” or “proposal” — which is exactly the technical ground on which the ministry is basing its denial. The document does, however, reportedly detail Bhutan’s concerns about its fuel storage tanks, and notes that Bhutan has asked India to give advance notice if it eventually moves to a fully ethanol-blended petrol regime, so local fuel dealers have time to upgrade their tanks.

Adding weight to the storage concerns, Bhutan’s largest fuel distributor, Tashi BOD, has separately said its stations currently aren’t equipped to handle ethanol-blended fuel because of the same seepage problem.

The Bigger Picture

The spat comes at a time when India’s own domestic E20 rollout is facing scrutiny, with users reporting reduced mileage and increased vehicle wear.

Notably, neither Lamsang nor the ministry has released the full document publicly. That means the central question — whether an offer was formally extended or merely raised informally during talks — remains unresolved.

| Read Our Editorial Guidelines | Stay updated with the latest news! Don’t forget to follow us. X (Formerly Twitter), WhatsApp Channel, Telegram, Facebook

Disclaimer: The information provided here is gathered from various sources, and there may be discrepancies between the data presented and the actual information. If you identify any errors, please notify us via email at [hi[@]thejanpost.com] for review and correction.

Written by: TheJanPost Staff
The Jan Post is an alternative and independent media platform established with the aim of bringing public concerns to the forefront and highlighting important issues related to society in India. Our goal is to shed light on topics, communities, and grassroots issues that often do not receive adequate coverage in mainstream media. We cover politics, education, sports, entertainment, international news, expert opinions, and inspiring stories of individuals who have made notable contributions to society. The Jan Post strives to promote awareness and meaningful dialogue on public-interest issues through fair, factual, and responsible journalism.

Leave a comment